I look at these new programs and think I'm seeing a differant language, what are these things? Better mouse traps? Are they better than what was happening before them?
I read about mastering programs and cringe, what are they selling mastering dreams made of smoke? Every home mastered project I've heard, in house, mostly sucks to me and come with qualifications, QUALIFICATIONS? I don't want excuses, I want to be blowen away with sonic excelance. I want to hear the quality I do on the radio, not an unreasonable repersentation. The only way I'm satisfied is with profesional help from a mastering lab.
Any way, where is enough? Now must I learn all this mastering stuff just to know what not to do? Lets see, I can spend a few hundred dollers for a program to use lots of times or just trust my mastering guy and pay him about $600.-800. to do a great job with a satisfaction guarnte, I have pushed that to the limit at differant points but end up with great sounds.
Now even in the recording end there is this new wave of programs that I'll have to learn, they don't seem any better than what I have, are they? Or is it just the consumer in me that thinks I'd better keep up with the new fashions in recording software?
I spent years learning the 'analog way', it used to confuse me with 36 inputs going to 20 tracks of 2". Now I look back and think it was heaven. Keeping track of digital numbers on one track is very confusing these days and I 'try' to keep it simple - SHEESH!